Talk:Vienna Capital Partners

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vienna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vienna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ViennaWikipedia:WikiProject ViennaTemplate:WikiProject ViennaVienna articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Private Equity

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity articles

dead links

The article contains two dead links, which are tagged accordingly. They are kept in the article according to Wikipedia:DEADLINK. Feel free to replace them, if you find suitable alternatives.--spitzl (talk) 00:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some corrections

I have made a couple of minor corrections and changed some instances of unclear wording.

Main changes were:

clearing up the ownership structure; all information about the ownership is available from public filings in Austria and there is actually nothing intransparent or "opaque" about it
removed the nonsense about an allegation made by Europol; it is simply not true, which is obvious even from the original source provided by the original author (where the accusation is made about "a Hungarian Bank" but has nothing to do with VCP)

Disclosure: I work for VCP. Nevertheless, I only made minor changes supported by reliable sources and corrected some factual errors. Obviously I would also like to remove the sentence in the introduction about the "intransparent links" as wells as the section on Russia, because I feel it does not characterize the company fairly. But I understand that this is a matter of judgement and it should probably be removed by somebody who is more impartial than I am.

Cf321 (talk) 15:50, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership

Can anyone verify that the russian FSB is the ones actuallty running the company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.9.14 (talk) 09:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]