Talk:VetBact

(1) The "orphan tag" was added to this page on 21 February 2014. There are now links to this page from a couple of other pages (plus one redirecting page). Is this enough not to consider it an orphan anymore? If so, how do we go about removing the tag?

(2) Regarding the second issue ("this article relies on references to primary sources"): I have added a second reference to a source which I believe should be considered "secondary". It is a student's thesis on the use of the VetBact database at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. It was originally published on the university website (where it is still available on https://internt.slu.se/Documents/internwebben/sus-docs/UPC/Dokument/Projektkurs/UPC_MonaFredriksson.pdf) although the link on the VetBact page is to a copy kept on the www.vetbact.org. Can this be considered a secondary source? If not, what sort of source should we be looking for? Is it a problem that the thesis was written in Swedish? Staffan t (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the "orphan" and "primary sources" complaint tags since they no longer seem to be relevant. Staffan t (talk) 15:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]