Talk:Vertical viola
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Vertical viola be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
Measurement
[edit]10cm, or 2 1/2in? 'cause, like, one is twice as much as the other.
- This is now corrected. Opus33 3 July 2005 14:09 (UTC)
External link
[edit]Would this [[1]] information be more relevant to this site than the viola page?DeineMutter 18:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nope. It covers the viola da gamba, which is a completely different instrument family. Opus33 20:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Vertical viola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120728162153/http://www.sonyclassical.com/music/57961/ to http://sonyclassical.com/music/57961/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)