Talk:Verna Pratt

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Alaska Low‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Horticulture and Gardening

	Gardening portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Peer review

Good job on keeping a neutral tone throughout the article, the information is to the point and informative. I know there aren't that many sources on Verna Pratt so I don't blame you for not have a lot. Some useful information I recommend adding is the awards and recognition she got like the Helen S. Hull Literary Award, which could be a new section in the article, and maybe her teaching history as well. I also recommend adding a picture of Verna Pratt in the infobox. And for your sources, make sure to add the little hyperlink ID number after using a source. SketchyPencil (talk) 00:58, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that you did a good job keeping a neutral tone. I think you could add a section on her life in Alaska and the books she wrote. EKFrance (talk) 04:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alaska Women's Hall of Fame contains a reference to https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2017/01/09/wildflower-wizard-verna-pratt-dies-in-anchorage while this article does not. This is an actual news story reporting on her death, which is highly preferable to an obituary. That story contains a mention of another news story from 1992, which also isn't represented in the article. Instead of claiming sources don't exist, perhaps you should invest just a little effort to investigate further like I did. The article's creator is participating in Wikipedia via a class at the University of Alaska Anchorage. The public is currently being kept out of the UAA/APU Consortium Library, which hosts the only known public access to the NewsBank archive of the Anchorage Times (the Anchorage Public Library declined to subscribe). Considering how far back her public renown stretches, this is quite possibly another treasure trove of reliable sources. Hope this helps. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 12:02, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Verna Pratt flowers into Verna Pratt

Not enough substance for stand-alone article, could easily be merged into the main article on the person in question, which would also better help establish context. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. Not enough for a standalone article, but would make excellent material in existing article.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:56, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per nom. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 06:56, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality content, but could easily be integrated into main article. Sauzer (talk) 20:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:01, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]