Talk:Vermont Law and Graduate School

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as High-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

VLSCommunications (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
VTLawSchool (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Vermont Law School (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Vermont Journal of Environmental Law

The Vermont Journal of Environmental Law is now only published online, not in print. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.84.2 (talk) 19:47, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

VLS Seal

I have put an image of the VLS seal on wikipedia three times now, and twice its been removed as suspect. This image was provided BY VLS, it is the correct image, etc. (please see the seal for further copyright information). If anyone has any questions or comments regarding the seal, please notify me so I can address them. Crogle94 (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for Vermont Law School 43.8159° N, 72.5457° W

68.112.84.2 (talk) 15:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—68.112.84.2 (talk) 15:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Both the coordinates in the article and those you supplied appear to be incorrect. I've emended the coordinates to correspond to the location indicated on the school's Web site. Deor (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of 18 February 2013 by anonymous at 70.180.225.229

Major edits to this page were performed on February 18, 2013, by an anonymous author at IP address 70.180.225.229. These edits distort the accuracy of the Vermont Law School Wikipedia entry by overemphasizing minor current events (such as including a special entry on staffing numbers), repeating information already on the page (such as the accurate tuition) and by prioritizing less significant information through an emphasis on a single source (Law School Transparency site).

First: The scope of these edits that emphasizes current events, such as staff cutbacks, by prioritizing that information at the top of the page, should be re-edited to better reflect the significance of that information. Seems plainly of lower priority than the profile of the entering class, the description of actual campus and facilities, and academic offerings. Wikipedia pages should not be current events forums. Editing the page to focus on the news story de jour undermines the page. If relevant, serves better elsewhere and lower on page's priority.

Second: The author at IP address 70.180.225.229 seems unfamiliar with this page. Tuition information was already included on the page in a format consistent with other educational institutions (see the infobox at top of page, which plainly includes tuition information).

Third: The February 18 edits all seemed engineered to promote a particular website that criticizes law schools (Law School Transparency). An author at IP address 70.180.225.229 made edits to three law school Wikipedia pages on February 18, 2013; all edits re-published information from the same critical website. All edits made employment statistics a primary page element, inconsistent with the vast array of law school and higher education pages.Crogle94 (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate information

The section concerning student loan debt should be removed. The information, which is probably accurate, interesting, and important to some, doesn't belong in a general encyclopaedia. The section's author, perhaps unintentionally, is implying that Vermont Law School is overpriced. It might be overpriced, but that is both an arguable point and an irrelevant one to put before the readers of a general interest encyclopaedia. And, frankly, the figures given don't nearly support the inference that the author seems to want drawn. The section presents a biased opinion. General entries aren't supposed to be polemical--toss it.

New article to use

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/21/us/vermont-law-art-slavery.html

-- $ɱ$ (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]