Talk:Veridicality
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Veridicality article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
General treatment
[edit]This article was not about veridicality, but about how veridicality is treated in some specific theory. Many of the statements were false from a more general perspective. — kwami (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Also, this article seems to be more about polarity items than veridicality. --Lomacar (talk) 08:18, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The flaw I see is that we have on Wiki "Veridicality" as a W header, without "Nonveridicality" even though the property the former expresses implies the opposite; otherwise it would have no meaning. If one is notable and definable, so too is the inverse. To define and wiki one without the other is at best an incomplete statemtn. Citizen Sunshine (talk) 12:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- Start-Class Theoretical Linguistics articles
- Theoretical Linguistics Task Force articles
- Start-Class philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles