Talk:Verdiem

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Advert Tag

I removed the advert tag from this article, since the coverage seems reasonably factual. The article could still do with fewer primary sources in my opinion. VQuakr (talk) 05:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have just removed another spam tag from the article. The coverage is very factual.Hnobley (talk) 14:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? The entire page reads like a company press release, and in fact it seems to be written solely from Verdiem press releases. Some independent sources are needed badly. Quale (talk) 03:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Case studies

The Salix Finance Energy Efficient ICT Workshop case study shows the payback period for Verdiem Surveyor at University_of_the_West_of_England as 2.5 years. This information is on page 26. The payback period of an identical sized deployment at University_of_Sussex is reported as 0.5 years. This information is on page 27. The case study is unambiguous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.252.10 (talk) 15:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]