Talk:Vercelli Book

	Anglo-Saxon England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anglo-Saxon KingdomsWikipedia:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsTemplate:WikiProject Anglo-Saxon KingdomsAnglo-Saxon Kingdoms articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poetry Low‑importance

	Poetry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Vercelli Book is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Untitled

Friedrich Bloom don't sound much like a man from Germany, perhaps Friedrich Blume is better? --FinnWiki (talk) 03:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

According to a Jstore article the name should be spelled Blüme, jfr The Vercelli Book: A New Hypothesis. Sound even better. --FinnWiki (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I think the two pages Vercelli Book and Anglo–Saxon Codex Vercellensis are talking about the same thing.

As we can see here, there are two “Codex Vercellensis”, one old-latin and one old-english. The first is explained in Codex Vercellensis#Old Latin Codex Vercellensis — this article should be better; the second is so explained on the two pages I propose to merge.

Sorry for my bad english. Fronſère (talk) 01:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~:Oppose I don't think this is right; they have different catalogue numbers, & the contents are different.~~ Johnbod (talk) 02:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The two codex are told containing 23 homilies, 6 anglo-saxon poems : Andreas, [Address of the] Soul to [the] Body], Falseness of Men, Dream of the Rood, etc. The catalogue numbers should be an error — it's « Codex CVII » and « Codex CXVII ». What contents are differents? Fronſère (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge ok, and CXVII is right, though the other is from a source. I don't think there's more to discuss - I'll just do it. Johnbod (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]