Jump to content

Talk:Ven Conmigo (album)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 17:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I believe I have fixed everything you have raised here in the review. The only thing I did not do is the source for the 180,000 number, as the source is listed there as #25 source #50 is for the units it has sold from a different source as it does not represent the shipment certification number listed by the RIAA. Best – jona 15:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Review

[edit]

Done with review. MX () 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lead paragraph

[edit]
  • following a woman's struggles after many failed relationships. – Was this specifically to women? In the body it just mentions failed relationships. Could it be that it applied to all sexes? MX () 20:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]
  • Selena chronology and Selena studio album chronology – Please spell "Éxitos". In addition, do you know what the policy is for chronology in infoboxes? I'm asking because Mis Primero Exitos and Entre a Mi Mundo are not mentioned elsewhere in the article. Per WP:INFOBOXCITE, info in the infobox has to be cited elsewhere in the body paragraphs. Would you check / be able to fix this?

Production and development

[edit]
  • division with Jose Behar as president – José
  • the Los Dinos band continued to tour with her – I'm a native Spanish speaker, so I'm a bit biased with this. But shouldn't you consider removing "the" from Los Dinos. The sentence is fine without it.

Recording and composition

[edit]
  • Ven Conmigo has been described as containing half cumbias and half rancheras. – I don't want this to be flagged with "According to whom?" How do you feel about removing "has been described as" and just state what it includes? You do it in the following sentence anyways.
  • Abraham Quintanilla, Jr.—the group's manager (A.B. Selena, and their sister Suzette's father) – Who is Suzette? You don't want readers to stop right here and look up who this person is. Why not simply stick to Selena's father, which readers will know is also A.B.'s father since they read he was her sibling just earlier.
  • Patoski though the song was – thought
  • thought [sounded] better" recalled Pérez – I would link Chris Pérez. No mention of this person before in the sections (he is in the lead, but since you introduced/linked everyone again in the sections, I rather you do that here too for consistency).
  • track that Suzette compared to a – if you decide to remove Suzette per the suggestion above, you can introduce this person now.

Promotion

[edit]
  • A.B. discovered 17-year old Chris Pérez, – link Chris in the previous mentioned and then remove link here and keep his last name.
  • A.B persuaded Quintanilla Jr. – period after B.
  • She later shared another venue with Ramon Ayala, – Ramón
  • Author Joe Nick Patoski described Pérez' choreography – Correct me if I'm wrong. Should it be Pérez's?

Critical reception

[edit]
  • and 17 Super Exitos contributed to the $5 billion – The word éxitos has an accent. Same goes for súper (in Spanish), though I don't think they added it officially for her album. Can't expect everyone to know accent rules I guess...

Track listing

[edit]
  • All good here

Credits and personnel

[edit]
  • All good here

Charts

[edit]
  • All good here

Weekly charts

[edit]
  • All good here

Year-end charts

[edit]
  • All good here

Certifications and sales

[edit]
  • 180,000 – Please add a source here like you did for the other small claims in the boxes.

Sources

[edit]
  • Pérez 2012. – I think you might need a page for Source #19, since it is a book.

Article ready for promotion. MX () 22:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.