Talk:Vegetable box scheme
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 August 2008. The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Proposal for deletion
[edit]I have tidied the article and returned it to stub status rather than have it deleted. It is no longer an advertisement, but still needs work on finding references. I think it is a valid article, but certainly not in its previous format. Poltair (talk) 14:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Looks a lot better. As a suggestion, is the title might be better being "Organic box scheme" or "vegetable box scheme" or something else. Whatever is most commonly found in sources. Drunken Pirate (talk) 20:25, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- The most common term of reference seems to be "Veg box" or "Vegetable box" scheme, the latter being used in written references as more formal, I suppose. I've recreated Vegetable box scheme to redirect here for now, to cover Pirate's title suggestion, but if anyone feels strongly that the title should be "Vegetable box scheme" they can always swap them over using move/redirect. I'd avoid the "Organic box scheme" title just because not all schemes are organic, according to the cited sources. Karenjc 15:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
merger with csa
[edit]i think a box scheme is somewhat different from a csa, it is just a box delivered weekly or whatever, a form of marketing, whilst csa as the name implies goes a little bit further. i also think that this article should be called vegetable box scheme..Truetom (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vegetable box scheme. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130614075148/http://www.bbcgreen.com:80/Travel/UK-Holidays/Food/Organic/organic-box-schemes to http://www.bbcgreen.com/Travel/UK-Holidays/Food/Organic/organic-box-schemes
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080517015208/http://www.soilassociation.org/web/sa/saweb.nsf/%0bb0062cf005bc02c180256a6b003d987f/fb6952fe3232ff4d8025729f0052b8ce%21OpenDocument to http://www.soilassociation.org/web/sa/saweb.nsf/%0Bb0062cf005bc02c180256a6b003d987f/fb6952fe3232ff4d8025729f0052b8ce!OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)