Talk:Veda (company)

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 September 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Australia Mid‑importance

Veda (company) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Notes

I have today been informed of the willful inaccuracies retained by Baycorp or Credit Advantage. The service provider made numerous conversations to correct a clients account and they simply did not listen and retained bad information.

They also advise the identites to approach issues in this manner on their website ( ie. asking service providers to contact them directly) -putting them out of the loop, then advising the service provider that the identity has the responsibility to write letters. This ensures nothing is resolved continually.

Would they resort to this to keep the information they've got regardless of accuracy and the harm it causes? Do they seem to think they would have no product to sell otherwise? Please advise of your experiences, here. I am considering a presentation to the Ombudsman of their industry. Don't be afraid speak. But speak clearly.

Credit Reference Association of Australia?

I can't make out the history. The article says "The Company was previously known as Baycorp Advantage, which was a merger of Australian company Data Advantage and New Zealand Company Baycorp." But I also read that Baycorp Advantage was previously "Credit Reference Association of Australia."[1][2] --Chriswaterguy talk 16:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cardreport.com/international/australia.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 08:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Company Rebranded as Equifax

https://www.equifax.com.au/rebrand Not sure what is necessary to update this page correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.203.126.218 (talk) 04:20, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]