Talk:Vauban-class ironclad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 01:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Odd that their fates are unknown. A few minor comments:

struck from the register
- Good catch
Both designs were based
- Fixed
suggest linking the displacement measurements in the body (long tons, t)
- Done
put the upper crew range in the infobox?
- Done
link knots/kn in body and infobox
- Done
the secondary battery is not in the infobox
- Good catch
you could put the deck armor in the infobox
- Done
yearlong→year-long as a compound adjective
- Done

That's all I could find. Placing on the hold for the above to be addressed. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You'd think after having done several of the articles in the series, I'd have gotten better at them ;) Parsecboy (talk) 22:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, great work as usual. This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by acceptably licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]