Talk:Vanessa Beecroft

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

peacock

The first paragraph: not only does it contain peacock terms but it also uses vague and imprecise langueage that could only be accepted here in citations . The result is that the reader cannot actually get information, they are instead exposed to panache of words that say very little. Well, I was the reader, I wanted to read something about the artist. Instead I read how I should interpret her "uniquely complex fusion and aesthetic concerns". - Mohylek 16:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. An example: "The performances are existential encounters between models and audience, their shame and their expectations." Who says? What even is an 'existential encounter'? 50.100.30.43 (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

user

The whole article feels overtly favorable to this person, feeling more like an advertisement.

user2

I agree with the user above; page is very favorable and not fitting to a fairly controversial artist. 198.40.29.4 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

The Art Star and the Sudanese Orphans

Yes, odd article. And further, strange that the only link to the movie above, of which she is the focus, mentions nothing about the content of the movie itself. Perhaps a more appropriate link would be to Rotten Tomatoes for the movie, or http://jam.canoe.ca/Movies/Reviews/A/Art_Star_And_The_Sudanese_Twins/2009/03/20/8819551-sun.html ? - 202.46.177.2 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Vanessa Beecroft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.deitch.com/artists/press_text.php?pressId=12
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104203506/http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897 to http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100104203506/http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897 to http://observatory.designobserver.com/entry.html?entry=2897

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20051013065840/http://www.gagosian.com/artists/vanessabeecroft/, http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T096699 and https://web.archive.org/web/20071231123951/http://www.artbook.com/catalog--art--monographs--beecroft--vanessa.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI?

I worked today on cleaning up a lot of this article, it had very few citations (and is a BLP). I added in many RS citations, cleaned up the details. I noticed prior to some of the clean up efforts there had been a lot of peacocking and personal details added without citation. I am adding a note here in case this issue persists. Jooojay (talk) 01:00, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see in the history someone with the user name "Vanessa Beecroft" was editing this article in 2017 and the copyvio issues started in 2006 with an IP user. Jooojay (talk) 01:05, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

More COI type of edits were made today by an IP address user removing citations. Jooojay (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]