Jump to content

Talk:Vanadium/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I concur to this. While cute, there are hundreds of compounds more relevant than the book. Nergaal (talk)
I like it but if it is not necessary we can delet it.--Stone (talk) 17:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it. Gary King (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted!--Stone (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The prose needs to be better. Shouldn't "that has the symbol" be "that is represented by the symbol"? "was (incorrectly) suggested" – The brackets are unnecessary. Please give the entire article a run-through. Gary King (talk) 22:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will try my bes tomorrow.--Stone (talk) 22:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tried to improve, but still ..... --Stone (talk) 21:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Is it ready for me to take another look, or do you want more time? Gary King (talk) 21:35, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Will call for help at the Elements project! And than I will be back.--Stone (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now it got a complete workover and I think it is OK now, please have a look.--Stone (talk) 06:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gary King (talk) 16:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are a lot of small paragraphs. Can you merge them (logically) so that they flow better?
  • Can you narrow down the number of images in the article? Free images are good, yes, but sometimes it's possible to go overboard with too many. Choose the ones that are most appropriate, and the rest can be left to a link to a Commons page. All four images in the gallery, for instance, is that necessary?

Gary King (talk) 19:51, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merged several of the small paragraphes and reduced the number of images! Now better? The gallery was really a little to much. --Stone (talk) 20:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay passing Gary King (talk) 20:44, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]