A fact from Vale of Avoca (bridge) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the Vale of Avoca bridge in Toronto was opened in 1924, replacing an iron bridge from 1888 (both pictured)?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada's streets and arterial thoroughfares on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canada StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject Canada StreetsTemplate:WikiProject Canada StreetsCanadian street articles
I know this is picky, but the article (which is excellent, by the way) states that "In 1973, Toronto officially named the bridge structure and the ravine as The Vale of Avoca", but the citation provided doesn't really say this -- it just says that "In 1973 the vale was formaly named as a vale, after Avoca St". Since a vale is a valley, all this says is that "the valley was formally named as a vale." It doesn't say anything about the bridge.
I'm not saying that local people don't call the bridge a vale -- I live in a different neighbourhood so I don't know -- I'm just saying that the source doesn't confirm this. And it's a weird enough thing that I think it could use a source -- calling a bridge a vale (i.e. a valley) is rather odd, after all...it's like calling the Bloor viaduct the "Don Valley". WillNL (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It could probably be rewritten slightly. Most of the article is based on a historical file at the Deer Park library but is sourced to additional writings. The bridge doesn't appear to have its own formal name, and so its just the Vale of Avoca bridge I believe. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲτ¢20:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
