Talk:VI Airlink

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 June 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
	This article is supported by the airline project.

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British Virgin Islands work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

I think by now there is at least a credible claim that this company is notable, so it should not be speedy deleted. --AdAstra reloaded (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that there are other pages linking to VI Airlink, most notably Terrance B. Lettsome International Airport. Therefore, if VI Airlink would be deleted, this would create red links. In my opinion this is a loss of information, because a reader of the airport destination list would not get any information about the airline. Thus, I think the airticle should stay. (I know, this is not an argument... but there are numerous articles here covering similarily small airlines, for example (just to name three) FLN Frisia Luftverkehr, L-3 Flight International Aviation or European Executive) AdAstra reloaded (talk) 21:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That argument is not really effective. If this is not notable, it should not be wikilinked in those articles. --Crusio (talk) 00:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]