Talk:Uttarakhand/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jonahman10 (talk · contribs) 20:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC) I will be overlooking this article in the next few days. Feel free to add comments to what I post.
Quick initial overlook
[edit]There appears to be a lack of in-line citations near the end of the article, but the problem does not to be too extensive despite several statements that need citation. I will look further to see if this will be an issue in the full review.
The Article seems to be developed enough in general and appears to be relatively stable.
No immediate issues in Grammar either.
Link Checker finds several links as outdated.
Full review
[edit]Under review now...
- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (prose) | Minor grammatical errors which I corrected myself. |  Pass
|
| (b) (MoS) | Overall good, but the section on education needs some work. The music industry would be more appropriate in the economy section and recently in this section could be replaced by a more concrete date. Furthermore, the first paragraph could be converted to list form to be more accessible. The different sections need to be distinguished more or consolidated. |  Fail
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | The reviewer has no notes here. |  Undetermined
|
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| (c) (original research) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| (b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| Notes | Result |
|---|---|
| The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass
|
| (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Undetermined
|
Result
[edit]| Result | Notes |
|---|---|
| Undetermined |
The reviewer has no notes here. |
The original reviewer went inactive, so I'll take over. The article starts okay, but halfway through the articles gets a lot harder to read and becomes almost entirely unreferenced. As a result this is quickfailed. Make sure everything is cited before re-adding to GAN. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)