Jump to content

Talk:Uppsala Cathedral/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jionpedia (talk · contribs) 18:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will review it in the next coming days. Regards, --Jionpedia 18:26, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great job, Blofeld. Hardly any flaws. I fixed the minor problems, though.

Final analysis

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Don't get it delisted! Thanks, --Jionpedia 15:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jion, Ipigott deserves most of the credit though..♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:32, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]