Talk:Upper West Side Story

Upper West Side Story has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 1, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Television

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Upper West Side Story/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
~~Wikilink "Third season" in the lead~~

~~Sources aren't need in the lead. I'd move [1] to "Production" and [2] down to the "Ratings" section~~

The first half of the production section is unsourced (who wrote it, how many they've written, etc.). Add a reliable source that confirms all of that. Also, do you have a citation to state who directed what? Maybe just cite the episode itself

The lead mentions that the episode features "many themes of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and contains various allusions to Shakespearean and Victorian-era literature, however, this is not explained or even mentioned in the production section. Please expand this section quite a bit and add citations.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~Italicize A.V. Club in Refs. 1 and 7~~
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days to straighten out the issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! I pass!--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]