Talk:Up in the Air (novel)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plagiarism from New York Times review

The plot summary of this novel is plagiarized nearly wholesale from the New York Times review cited at bottom. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.87.168 (talk) 04:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book versus film

Please remember that this article is about the book, Up in the Air, not Up in the Air (film). According to interviews with Walter Kirn and Jason Reitman, there are significant differences between the book and the film. One of these differences is that the millage goal in the book is one million miles whereas in the film it is ten million miles. Likewise, the character Alex Goran in the film is a composite of a number of women in the book and the character Natalie Keener is not in the book at all. The wedding is also not in the book. --Dan Dassow (talk) 17:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would someone who has read the book, please review the article to verify the plot is correct. Various editors have confused the book with the film and try to add details from the film that are not in the book. --Dan Dassow (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality scale

{{helpme}} I believe that this article has sufficient information to no longer be considered Stub-class and should be rated as Start-class or better. Would someone from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Novels please review this article to determine its correct rating? Note: the article now has cover art from the first edition. --Dan Dassow (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The {{helpme}} template is used to attract general help from all-around helpers. If you need someone from WikiProject Novels to check the article, your best bet is to leave them a message on their talk page. Thanks. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Potential citatations

Shapiro, Ariel (2010-02-05). "An interview with 'Up in the Air' author Kirn". The Daily Cardinal. Retrieved 2010-02-07.
- Talks about themes of book and film.
Caro, Mark (2010-02-06). "Answering pressing Oscar questions: Like why the 2 Ryan Binghams?". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2010-02-07.
- Kirn explains: "It's stranger than it even might seem at first," he said on the phone while visiting Los Angeles. "I named the character Ryan Bingham because Bingham is a last name common among Mormons, and I grew up a Mormon, and it was the last name of my first girlfriend. I gave him what is a typically Western name, and the novel was staged out of Denver airport.

--Dan Dassow (talk) 05:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions for novels

What is the preferred naming convention for a novel that exists prior to a film adapted from that novel? Specifically, an editor decided to move article about Walter Kirn's novel Up in the Air from Up in the Air to Up in the Air (book) with the thought of moving Up in the Air (film) to Up in the Air. Wouldn't Up in the Air (novel) be preferrable to Up in the Air (book) when there is ambiguity? --Dan Dassow (talk) 19:03, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the Novel's Name

The article stated that the novel's name came from a line in F. Scott Fitzgerald's last (unfinished) novel. However, Mr Kirn stated in an interview with a writer for The Daily Beast:

"UP IN THE AIR, I’d titled the book, both for its setting (airplanes, airports, airport hotels) and for the plight of its hero, Ryan Bingham, a rootless, restless management consultant who specializes in firing corporate workers whose bosses aren’t able to do the deed themselves, and who soothes his bad conscience by hoarding frequent-flier miles and their many perks." (http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/12/09/george-clooney-saved-my-novel.html) If Mr Kirn has made other, citationable statements about the title's provenance, that could be re-added to the article. --Spray787 (talk) 20:40, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Up in the Air (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090831064444/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/news/e3ide843f7bf07c511ffc026ea4b606ff51 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ide843f7bf07c511ffc026ea4b606ff51

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:05, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]