Jump to content

Talk:University of Pennsylvania Law School/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Auspicious beginnings?

The article currently claims that a single lecture series, conducted sixty years before the law school was founded (at a time when law was primarily taught under an apprenticeship model), was the law school's auspicious beginning. That doesn't seem to me like a neutral POV.

it should be OK (i.e., not POV) to say "the school dates its history back to..."•JZ 19:09, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Auspicious beginning

The page has been updated and no longer contains the words "auspicious beginning." Instead, it states that "The University of Pennsylvania Law School officially traces its origins to a series of lectures..." and continues with: "Following this early beginning, Penn began offering a full-time program in law in 1850..." Isn't that a neutral POV?

PennLaw 18:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes; however the POV tag can't be removed yet as there's other POV language in the article still. --BrokenSphere 19:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

How does one find out what the other non-NPOV language is? Thanks. PennLaw 20:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

For me, it's been reading through the article and looking for language that appears to be present an overly positive or biased spin, usually without citation, re. Penn Law; the Collegiality section is a good example of this. Now this isn't to say that that what that section says is untrue, it may seem that way to some people; it's just that the way that the info is presented in there imparts a definite bias on behalf of Penn Law. --BrokenSphere 21:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


As a Penn Law student, I think that although the entry for Penn Law was bad before (too much history, too little current information), this new one is just awful and sounds like it was written by a 5th grader. It is also exceedingly self-important and doesn't even attempt to appear dispassionate.

Neutrality

Hi everybody. I don't think the article is that bad, but I do agree with the neutrality dispute. It reads like a page out of an university website. However, this seems to be the case for most of the Ivy league Law articles in Wiki. (FT77 21:51, 17 August 2007 (UTC))

Fair use rationale for Image:PennLawShield.gif

Image:PennLawShield.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Quattrone Center

For your consideration as potent entail material for inclusion: Blumenthal, Jeff (28 May 2013). "Penn Law gets $15M to study criminal justice". Philadelphia Business Journal. Retrieved 28 May 2013. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:17, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on University of Pennsylvania Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University of Pennsylvania Law School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:41, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

New Section Added to Article

Hello Fellow Wikipedians,

I recently added the section Center for Ethics and the Rule of Law at the bottom of the article, just under the Toll Public Interest Center. I also wanted to disclose my COI just so that it is known and in compliance with guidelines. If you see anything at issue in my content, please let me know. Thank you.

Update: I removed this section as there were certain additions other members of the Center wanted to add before final posting that I was not aware of.

-Maximilian Francis (talk) 15:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Statistic updates

Hello, Wikipedia editors! I wanted to disclose my COI as a writer affiliated with Penn Law. I recently updated some previously-outdated statistics and language on the page.

Two alumni lists —is one sufficient?

Shouldn't the Notable alumni section be incorporated into the linked main article: List of Penn Law School alumni? Two lists seems redundant and unnecessary. Thanks, Lindenfall (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Adding that the section might be better edited along the lines of Berkeley School of Law#alumni and the List of UC Berkeley School of Law alumni articles. Lindenfall (talk) 15:33, 28 August 2020 (UTC)