Talk:University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dentistry Low‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Surely there is something worth saying about this university other than the basic facts and the scandals it has been through. Doesn't it have any noteworthy programs to describe? What about its facilities? Its faculty? Its alumni? The article should at least describe its degree programs and campuses. 4.131.154.113 (talk) 05:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"... it is the largest school of health sciences of its kind in the United States." This statement is meaningless unless we know what "kind" of school of health sciences it is. If it is the country's largest school of health sciences, then "of its kind" is redundant. Otherwise, the article should define this term. 4.131.154.113 (talk) 05:08, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The criminal complaint filed against the institution charges...double-billing of Medicaid between May 2001 and November 2008..." but the source cited (Health Care Fraud Report) notes that this happened "...between May 2001 and November 2004..."Gmtcwrite (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comments

These have been moved here from a subpage as part of a cleanup process. See Wikipedia:Discontinuation of comments subpages.

I have assessed this article as C-class and identified the following areas for improvement:

The article is not comprehensive and needs expansion

shirulashem (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040716082208/http://www.umdnj.edu:80/ to http://www.umdnj.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040910092341/http://www.umdnj.edu/ to http://www.umdnj.edu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:34, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"criminal conspiracy"

Recent edits have alleged in the article and in edit summaries that there was a criminal conspiracy. This is, alas, not justified. There was a deferred prosecution agreement; the UMDNJ was not prosecuted, and hence not found guilty of any criminal activity.

(It doesn't help that practically every source pertaining to this has gone 404. Sigh. I might see if IAbot can rescue some of them).

Likewise "conspiracy" doesn't seem to be justified. It takes two to conspire; with whom did UMDNJ conspire?

I do agree that the current wording - a series of over-billings - is too weak, but a strong wording would need to be sourced. In particular we simply cannot make unsourced allegations of criminality when charges have been, owing to a DPA, dropped. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments are wise and well-reasoned. I reverted your edit thinking you were trying to whitewash what happened. Nonetheless, I suspect conspiracy is the right word. While nobody was convicted it seems clear they did it. Tell you what, reflect about it for a day, maybe research if there is a policy and I will have no objection to whatever you may do. I am still in this Soprano State book. If I find more about this remarkable school, I shall add it. Great book. ''Paul, in Saudi'' (talk) 16:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly these deferred prosecution agreements produce an odd situation where there is no admission of wrongdoing and no guilty verdict even though it is well established that a thing which is ordinarily criminal happened. This makes it difficult to use words like "criminal" even though we are talking about a crime.

"Conspiracy" I think is an easier one - although I am slightly flippant in asking whom they conspired with, because clearly a conspiracy can be internal to a single organisation, it's difficult to argue that there was definitely such a degree of widespread - well, not just complicity but active agreement on the course of action - as can reasonably constitute a conspiracy.

In both cases I think the same advice applies - sources first! The more reliable sources can be found to justify either "criminal" or "conspiracy", the easier it is to put both words in the article. Pinkbeast (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Better to understate it than to risk losing credibility by using unsourced terms. The initial description, "Medicaid over-billings" that drew a "criminal complaint", still gives readers the picture. Barte (talk) 19:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]