Talk:University Chapel

Virginia Mid‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Chapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018050912/http://www.wdbj7.com/news/local/wl-to-remove-confederate-flags-from-lee-chapel/26847628 to http://www.wdbj7.com/news/local/wl-to-remove-confederate-flags-from-lee-chapel/26847628

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Chapel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071229100120/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=693&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=693&ResourceType=Building

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ted DeLaney

I went ahead and removed the Ted DeLaney bio from the article. DeLaney's only relationship with Lee Chapel appears to be a fairly vague quote he made about it. While the DeLaney info is interesting, it's irrelevant to include it here. Hathin (talk) 12:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Ted DeLaney info from this article. It is essential to the article. Ted DeLaney's relationship to the Chapel does not seem to be a fairly vague quote. It IS that he saw the Chapel nearly every day of his life, including when he could not enter because he was Black. He saw the effect on his hometown, community, undergraduate alma mater and academic institution. He saw it as an employee and professor for decades. He toured memorial sites throughout the South and studied and taught about them just steps from the Chapel. He spent more time in the Chapel than most people ever will. He was tasked by the University to study it, teach about it, and make recommendations about its use and meaning. This is all in the source cited. Very few, but all relevant credentials included in this article explain why his expert opinion is included and must be. His quote is not vague, it is direct. It is anything but extraneous to this article, but valuable context and information. Peterwyckham (talk) 06:24, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concur with removing DeLaney bio info for the reasons given. Please abide by Wiki NPOV. Thank you. 2600:1017:B12E:E83:0:14:EB0D:2501 (talk) 08:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view) While Ted DeLaney's view and criticism is relevant for this article and it should be included, his biography placed here is not. A separate article dedicated to him can be created where his credentials can be detailed (as multiple users have already pointed out). The idea of this article is to present the chapel's history, again from a neutral POV, not Delaney's (or Lee's, for that matter). Likewise for the characterization of Edward Valentine, which doesn't even appear in his own Wikipedia article. Peterwyckham, the tone is not really neutral at all ("Updated with expert statue opinion from the most qualified expert on W&L history ever, with citations." - edit summary from 04:47, 15 March 2021‎). Please create a separate page for Prof. DeLaney if his biography is required, a neutral article regarding him would be useful for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.52.185.10 (talk)

Robert E Lee IV

Grateful to editor Peterwyckham for catching my mistake and I post here for posterity, the information that activist Robert W. Lee IV who claimed falsely and repeatedly to be Robert E Lee's great-grandson in his anti-Confederate symbol activism until exposed by the Washington Post ^[1] -- is NOT the same as the authentic Robert E Lee IV, who was actually related to General Lee, and who wrote the letter cited on the Lee Chapel page. He died in 2020.^[2]

ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 21:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/05/14/this-man-says-hes-related-robert-e-lee-theres-no-evidence/

[2] ttps://www.legacy.com/us/obituaries/washingtonpost/name/robert-lee-obituary?id=2206088

[1]

[2]