Talk:University Air Squadron

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University Air Squadron article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Military history: Aviation / Technology / British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

External links

Jpgordon, may I ask why you removed the link to Northumbrian UAS that 129.234.4.1 added? It seems to be a bona fide link to the official page added in good faith, and is at least as relevant to the page as the others.

On the other hand, I personally don't think we should have links to the individual squadrons. They're duplicitous, and can adequately be covered by the link to the RAF's UAS page (which links to most of them anyway). See WP:NOT 1.5 and WP:EL for the appropriate policy. Unless anyone objects, I'll remove them in a week or so. --Scott Wilson 16:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]