Jump to content

Talk:Universal Migrator Part 2: Flight of the Migrator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lead section, 'creation'

[edit]

As mentioned in the Universal Migrator Part 1: The Dream Sequencer article talk, the information utilized in the lead and 'creation' sections of the article are not referenced, but are indeed verifiable, in the CD insert included with the 2004 UM re-issue. Tittery (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Track times?

[edit]

OK, so I got FotM (via torrent..) and the track times are way different, with exception to Tracks 1 and two.

Here's the track times the article gives:
01. 05:09
02. 07:45
03. 05:48
04. 08:43
05. 10:25
06. 06:05
07. 07:11
08. 06:12
09. 08:17

And here's the one I have:

01. 05:11
02. 07:45
03. 09:08
04. 12:25
05. 03:12
06. 11:46
07. 06:48
08. 02:45
09. 06:25

I have two theories about this:

a) Either the track times in the article are wrong, or
b) The guy who uploaded it reckoned that the songs ended at different times to what Wikipedia states.

So which one is it? I've currently imported the songs into Audacity to "re-correct" them.
~~NaN 22:01, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was probably me who wrote the times for this article, though I haven't gone through my contribs to check. I own the Universal Migrator two-CD package, North American release, and the times on the tracks exported from the CD are exactly what is written in the article down to the second. I'm thinking your torrented files are just inaccurate, though something seems amiss in that they'd be that far off. Bizarre! --Tittery (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that the guy thought the track times were off and tried to fix them themselves or something; I noticed that "To The Quasar" actually started on the "Quasar 3C273" movement, using LyricWiki as reference. Considering that the "The Taurus Pulsar" and "Quasar 3C 273" movements do sound like as if they would be different tracks and the 3C273 movement is the only one of the two movements that has mentions the song title in the lyrics (or at least, I don't recall the title being said in the "Taurus" movement), I can kinda see why some of the track lengths are wrong. Assuming that's the case, I'll simply re-cut the tracks myself. It's a good thing that both the lists add up to the same amount, then I'd be really worried there. :P
(~~Neo 2.3 Hylan/NaN, who hasn't logged in)62.105.186.82 (talk) 17:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Universal Migrator Part 2: Flight of the Migrator/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

B-class article criteria:

Green tickY All the start class criteria
Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Green tickY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Green tickY A casual reader should learn something from the article

This article now meets B-class article criteria. Tittery (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 04:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Universal Migrator Part 2: Flight of the Migrator. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]