Talk:UniverSoul Circus
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Animal rights
[edit]NPOV dispute [- Animal Safety]: This section has an obvious bias and appears to have been written by the organization itself (see e.g., use of the word 'we.'). -silic0nsilence (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Are the objections against this circus of any more concern than those leveled against other circuses? That is, has anyone said that UC takes worse care of animals than other circuses in general?
Or is UC just one of several well-known circuses targeted by [[animal rights] activists, whose aim is to ban use of animals entirely in circuses - irrespective of how "well cared for" the animals are? --Uncle Ed (talk) 22:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
It seems that you view your own question as rhetorical. However, I will answer anyway. I don't think that the way this circus compares to another is relevant in choosing which facts to put in this entry. Also, whether this oprganization has been specifically targeted by another or not (which I do not know the answer to nor do I care to), the facts remain the same.
Dizziewiki (talk) 17:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Is there a second source for the animal cruelty data? PETA is hardly a 'fair and unbiased' reference (Check PETA's Wikipedia page for details). Can we get the info from the USDA citations directly, rather than trusting a source who is not providing the sources for their own documents? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.141.69 (talk) 01:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)