This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
This page was marked for deletion by User:Martijn Hoekstra. I removed the PROD notice because the article is notable as a case decided by the United States Supreme Court which defined the State of Louisiana's rights to the lands, minerals and other natural resources underlying the Gulf of Mexico. I don't know much more about the case than what I briefly scanned on its findlaw site, but I would assume it would be relevant to the geographic history of the State of Louisiana and therefore notable for that reason as well. If anyone from Louisiana has an opinion about this, I would encourage them to weigh in soon before someone tries to delete the article.
I would also like to note, that until I created the disambiguation page for United States v. Louisiana, the case with this name from the same year (though with a different argue date) was noted as "one of most wanted pages on WP:WANTED". I'm not sure which case article was wanted the most (the other case with this argue date is Louisiana v. United States (1965) which I gave its own page), but I assume every single case that was important enough to reach the United States Supreme court is noteworthy. --Cdogsimmons20:06, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]