Talk:United States v. Emerson

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Out of date

The recent District of Columbia v. Heller decision by the SCOUS makes the last paragraph inaccurate. The experts in this field should update the article. Gentgeen (talk) 06:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I started a clean up of this. Famspear (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I deleted the Nordyke material. Some of these articles on gun laws seem to trudge though court decisions that have been reversed, vacated or overruled. This kind of detail is of interest to lawyers (full disclosure: I am a lawyer), but perhaps it's not as important for the typical readers of Wikipedia, most of whom are not lawyers. Famspear (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]