Talk:United States Youth Cricket Association

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Initial feedback

Hello, just have a few moments, but ping me later if you need more advice. The article is decent overall, but you way too heavily footnote to the WP:Primary sources (USYCA page). It's okay to occasionally quote the primary, when citing what they state as their mission statements, claimed start date, membership, etc. But generally if you're quoting large amounts of data from only the primary, that tends to mean (to be blunt) "info that no other media took interest in covering". Try to use USYCA cites sparingly to emphasise points that are clearly from a USYCA perspective, rather than quote them as a neutral/objective descriptor of reality. Your other cites from cricket media look great, however.

Next, do not use external links in-line in the text. That is, where you mention "American Cricket Champ" and it links to an outside website, take out all those links. External links (generally) belong only in the EL section. If you're mentioning a person/org in the text of the article, either link to their Wikipedia page by using double-brackets, or don't link at all. Again, not to be heartless, but by WP standards, if there isn't an article on "American Cricket Champ" already, it's not worth linking to (in a way that implies WP endorsement). For your EL section in general, you don't want to have the local clubs and whatnot, you really want to keep the list tight (per Wikipedia:NOT DIRECTORY); honestly just the USYCA official site and not much else. If there are other articles (not just websites) that are tangentially related, like "Teaching Cricket to Kids in a Baseball World" in Cricketing Weekly, those go under "Further reading."

Lastly (for now), avoid WP:Cruft. "Cruft" meaning "things people not directly involved honestly probably wouldn't be interested in." For example, the Leadership section: none of those people have their own WP bio, so it is highly unlikely the average reader will say "I'll be! James Smith is secretary treasurer?" If, I dunno, Al Gore were your Marketing Director, I'd mention that in-line somewhere, but otherwise it's not something fundamental to understanding your org, and folks can easily find it on your official site (handily linked at the top of the EL section).

Overall, really cool article, and the pics are great. You just need to scale back a bit of the insider's-perspective you bring as an enthusiast, and take a cold, hard look from the perspective of "everything I have here has to really matter even to people it doesn't matter to personally."

Forgive if I'm a bit brusque, but I'm a bit low on sleep and dealing with some other people being silly, so I'm a little blunt, but hopefully it gives you something to go with. After you feel you've made these changes, feel free to ping me again, though preferably on my Talk page. MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]