Talk:United States Telecom Association v. FCC (2004)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]History: Talking about 1996 Telecom Act leading to USTA I
Triennial Review Order: The creation of it after USTA I and its goals, etc.
Ruling: The court's opinion on the case
Implications: Business Implications and Consumer implications.
Look at possible implications with Wireless Networks.
Bakern10 (talk) 13:41, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
What if we move the TRRO below implications? It would make more sense to gave after the definition of the ruling I think. Bakern10 (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Michigan State University supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Spring