Talk:United States Army Special Forces selection and training
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Army Special Forces selection and training article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10th group photo
[edit]Why is there a photo of 10th group soldiers in an article about the Q course? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.20.111.117 (talk) 00:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- The Q course is only a portion of the article as it is only a portion of the training Army SF undergoes. Also covered in the article is SFAS, post Q course advanced training, and training conducted by individual Groups. The picture in question shows 10th Group soldiers conducting in Group training at their shoot house on Carson. TomPointTwo (talk) 08:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
I'm will be training with the army 2018. I have interest in the special forces being recruited by the Marines out of Highschool K-9 USA (talk) 03:10, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
I want to train to be the greatest that I can be to serve as a soldier in the army. I am so proud of my grandfather served as a Navy Seal and my other grandfather who served as a soldier in the Army. Now I have the same chance to serve as a soldier in the United States Army and I will never forget that Sacrifice that comes with the Responsibility that comes with the duty of an soldier K-9 USA (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Acronym Reference
[edit]Reading pages where acronyms are defined only once, and in text, is difficult for those not familiar with the subject. Two ideas to clarify this problem.
- Change all acronyms to actual terms. (not recommended)
- Add a section to acronym heavy articles. This section would act as a sort of appendix or glossary that would prevent the reader's need to scroll through the entire article looking for the one sentence that defines the acronym. It could also be set up to work with a template. Users add <acro name=foo> </acro> in the edit, and the tag {{acrolist}} near the bottom.
I think this is a pretty swell idea.Cliff (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- If you really wanted to build an acronym template I supposed it would be worth giving it a shot. Still, most acronyms should be defined or linked out to a parent article periodically in a lengthy article. You should also note that your browser will probably have a search function which is more often than not accessed using "ctrl+f". This can help you quickly find the oroginal (and so defined) instance of a word or acronym appearing on a page. TomPointTwo (talk) 06:47, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
"Gender neutral"
[edit]Why did we change these to "his or her" a bunch of times and not just use "their" — Preceding unsigned comment added by KM4JWL (talk • contribs) 01:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
ROBIN vs robin
[edit]So, like two years ago I edited a bunch of "Robin Sage" to ROBIN SAGE, but don't remember why, and can't seem to find any official references to it as an acronym or in all-caps, is it supposed to be like this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KM4JWL (talk • contribs) 02:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles