Jump to content

Talk:United Nations Security Council Resolution 1546

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Full sovereignty?

[edit]

Previous wording implied that the handover of day-to-day civil authority from the CPA, to an interim government composed of Iraqis chosen by and appointed by foreigners marked the return of full sovereignty.

Resolution 1546 doesn't state this. I think it is clear that the resolution was merely applauding a step towards the gradual restoration of full sovereignty.

I invite those who consider this handover to have completed the transition to full sovereignty to consider:

  • The CPA's 100 plus decrees remained in full effect -- note, in particular,
    • who set the rules for the adoption of the new Iraqi constitution.
    • "Contractors", including Mercenaries remained immune from Iraqi law.
    • Contracts signed by the CPA couldn't be cancelled or renegotiated by the Interim government
  • The USA continued to be the ultimated military authority in Iraq.
  • The Iraqi's didn't choose the members of the interim government.

-- Geo Swan 23:22, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]