Talk:Unionist Party (Punjab)

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unionist Party (Punjab) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: History / Politics Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

This article is totally and completely inaccurate.

1-The party's name was Unionist Party. It was an alliance of Muslim feudals and Hindu industrialists.

2- It seconded Muslim League's Lahore resolution.

3- All India Muslim League of Jinnah's did not ask for the partitioning of Punjab and Bengal.

4- Khizer Hayat Tiwana was NOT the son of Sikandar Hayat. Sikandar Hayat's son Shaukat Hayat was with Jinnah. -- unsigned comment by 203.81.196.194 13:06, 16 March 2006

Plase put your "CORECTIONS:" section on this talk page, not on article itself... AnonMoos 13:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

"were the twin founders of this great party." for instance, lots of other pov stuff I can see just scanning the page aswell. AlexTG (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've done my best to strip out all explicitly POV stuff from the article, as well as making a few other changes. Hopefully it's now a reasonable article for an expert to expand upon. Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]