This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia
I think we should stay at "Union of Wilno". It's slightly more common on regular Google, and Britannica uses it. Neither "Union of Wilno" or "Union of Vilnius" show up on Google Books. Appleseed (Talk) 20:28, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If I remember correctly Britannica uses formulation Union of Wilno (Vilnius) so if this name was "based" on this source it is already inaccurate. Actually I convinced that it should bear Treaty or some close equivalent to this word. I would support the change. M.K.11:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see why you think the Britannica title is inaccurate. Also, can you provide some reasons why "Treaty" is better than "Union" (other than simply being convinced it's right)? Appleseed (Talk) 14:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First of all, I said if this article name was based on Britannica naming analogy - is incorrect, because Britannica uses Union of Wilno (Vilnius) formulation; second - Treaty or some close equivalent. M.K.16:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think "Vilnius" is just there for clarification. As for "Treaty" and its equivalents, I welcome any sources you can provide to support them. Appleseed (Talk) 16:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
