Talk:Union Turnpike (Hudson County)

U.S. Streets Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Streets, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of streets in the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. StreetsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. StreetsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. StreetsU.S. city street
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey

This redirect is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey

Proposed deletion of County Route 676 (Hudson County, New Jersey)

Hello Djflem, I've nominated an article you created, County Route 676 (Hudson County, New Jersey) for proposed deletion, I have the following concern: "Not quite sure how this is notable, I can't see it meeting WP:GNG or being fit for inclusion under any other policy/guideline"

If you disagree to its proposed deletion please let me know and I will take the article through the AfD process instead, thank you.

Note that if the prod template remains on the article for 7 days then the page it will be deleted, please ask me if you have any questions about the proposed deletion process, thanks Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you've got to add some more--it should be possible. Pleasecheck with the NJ RpoadsWikiProject.DGG (talk) 01:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you will note, this article has been moved and expanded. Union Turnpike is a historic thoroughfare in the devlopment of the road system of Hudson County, New Jersey and hence the county itself, particularly taken in context with other turnpikesand plank roads. Djflem (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seems a reasonable way to go. Since it is an historic thorofare, try to find some history on it. DGG (talk) 19:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll let it stand for now, but you're going to need more sources then just a Street Map to make a convincing case for its notability. All the best Spitfire^Tally-ho! 20:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New new name change

I didn't realize that you had already moved the article. Are you alright with the current title? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:50, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine with name change, but shield will only appear in article at 30px. Can live with that, too.Djflem (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've made it 90px now, is that better? Spitfire^Tally-ho! 21:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]