Talk:Unilink

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hmmm.....

"unrelated and not ecyclopediable. unlink.myfreeforum was not official even though it was linked from the original site. uni-link.info has been replaced by a site with the sa)"

Unrelated even though it is totally related. Note how the uni-link website is all about uni-link and run by the company, which the article is about.
not ecyclopediable - If that isn't then nothing on the whole of wikipiedia is. It is about the company, and is revevant to it. Like the routes are, unless they're not.
unlink.myfreeforum was not official even though it was linked from the original site. - It was. Linked with the site. Run by a uni-link driver who even had the responsibility of doing the main website. Two of the managing directors as members.
uni-link.info has been replaced by a site with the sa)"A sentence has been said all about how the orininal website was closed and about the replacment for it, and it got deleted

Extre Information ref to the close of the old site was due to the named driver over stepping the mark, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.140.146 (talk) 13:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Daft isn't it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.17.253.220 (talk) 20:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The missing image is in the commons

[1] there. Does anyone know how to add it to the article? JHJPDJKDKHI! 09:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Waggers 11:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Minerva Accord in 1999?

I came to Southampton in 2000 and UniLink was most definitely still being run by FirstGroup. It wasn't until 2001 that Minerva Accord started providing the UniLink service. Alas, I have no citation for it though. AndyLandy (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Unilink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130130012026/http://www.unilinkbus.co.uk/the-key.shtml to http://www.unilinkbus.co.uk/the-key.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]