Talk:Ungodly Hour/GA1

GA Review

This review is transcluded from the article's talk page.

Reviewer: VersaceSpace (talk · contribs) 17:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gonna review this. It may be worth noting that I added some content to the article a few months ago, but all of it has been re-written by an unrelated editor, so it'll be fine. versacespace leave a message! 17:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

"but did not win in any category" can be omitted because this is implied already by the fact that they "were nominated".
Also that inline citation in the second para is making me gag
Infobox is good

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording

specify what grammy awards the kids were alright were nominated for

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

"record with elements" -> "record which contains elements"
The inline citations here should go behind each genre (behind the comma as well)
Why is this section so short? Can we at least have a paragraph?

Concept and themes

at the end of the section, why are single quotations used for the song lyrics when they aren't inside any normal quotations?

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 04:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion

The vinyl release still has a citation needed tag

Live performances

"Do It" is wikilinked too many times here.
"Forgive Me" is linked too much as well.

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 13:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

Good

Year-end lists

Good

Awards and nominations

Good

Commercial performance

This section doesn't present a worldwide view of the topic. The album charted in other countries. How did it do there?

Track listing

For track 8, "with Swae Lee and Mike Will Made It" doesn't need to be in small font.

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 13:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

Good

Credits and personnel

Throughout the section, the track markers in small font marked "1, 2" should be "1-2". Same with other chronological numbers.

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Instrumentation

Wikilink the first instance of "strings" to string instrument

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production

Wikilink the first instance of "production" to music producer

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technical

Wikilink the first instance of "mixing" to music mixing
Wikilink the first instance of "engineering" to music engineer

Fixed -- dylx^{(t | c)} 16:37, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charts

Good

Release history

Good

References

Ref 5: isn't Genius unreliable for lyrics?
Refs 12, 28, 41...and 46, and 50...and 53, 54, 57, 71...72, uh...103, and 111, and 115, and also 116: un-wikilink Billboard (already wikilinked in citation 10)
Refs 18, 56, 96, 97: un-wikilink UPROXX (already wikilinked in citation 17)
Ref 22: Is the Medium article written by a professional? Anyone can write articles on there. See WP:UGC.
Ref 23: should have MTV News un-wikilinked (already wikilinked in citation 6)
Ref 25: un-wikilink BET (already wikilinked in citation 19)
Ref 29: un-wikilink Twitter (already wiki-linked in citation 26)
Ref 32, 82: un-wikilink Idolator (already wikilinked in citation 21)
Refs 33, 35, 40, 93: un-wikilink Rated R&B (already wikilinked in citation 27)
Ref 37: perhaps wikilink Chloe x Halle
Ref 47: Honestly...that looks pretty unreliable, can we replace it?
Refs 49 and 92: un-wikilink PopSugar (already wikilinked in citation 39)
Ref 58: same story as 47, not liking that source
Refs 65 and 90: un-wikilink Pitchfork (already wikilinked in citation 34)
Ref 66: un-wikilink Rolling Stone (already wikilinked in citation 14)
Ref 70: wikilink AP NEWS to Associated Press.
Ref 73: un-wikilink Clash (already wikilinked in citation 9)
Ref 74: un-wikilink Complex (already wikilinked in citation 31)
Ref 76: un-wikilink The Fader (already wikilinked in citation 36)
Refs 78 and 79: un-wikilink The Guardian (already wikilinked in citation 63)
Ref 84: doesn't name the publication which released the article
Ref 88: un-wikilink Our Culture Mag (already wiki-linked at citation 64)
Ref 89: un-wikilink People (already wikilinked in citation 24)
Ref 99: should have USA Today un-wikilinked (already wikilinked in citation 2)
Ref 102: doesn't name the source used
Ref 114: un-wikilink Official charts (already wikilinked at citation 113)

General comments

That summarizes my concerns so this is On hold.
Oh, one more thing, wiki-linked songs should only be wikilinked on the first mention, in the tracklist, and in the infobox

Comments by other users (including the nominator)

@VersaceSpace: about the citation needed tag about the vinyl release, I don't see it on my end. can you specify where it appears so I can remove it? thank you! -- dylx^{(t | c)} 12:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylx: looks like its been fixed already versacespace leave a message! 12:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@VersaceSpace: another thing: I can't un-wikilink Twitter in ref 29, since it uses the {cite tweet} template. do you want me to replace the reference? -- dylx^{(t | c)} 12:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also can't un-wikilink Official Charts in refs 113 and 114, since they were created using the {album chart} template. -- dylx^{(t | c)} 13:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dylx: eh...in that case, I guess both could be left as is versacespace leave a message! 13:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay! I believe up to this point, I've addressed all your concerns! thanks for taking the time to review this article, I appreciate it! -- dylx^{(t | c)} 13:27, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HeyitsBen, Dylx this looks good! I'm passing this article. ✓ Pass