Talk:Unbound Group

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Private Equity

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Private Equity, a collaborative effort to improve the depth of quality and coverage of the private equity and venture capital industry and related topics in Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This project seeks to collaborate with the following WikiProjects:

Private EquityWikipedia:WikiProject Private EquityTemplate:WikiProject Private EquityPrivate Equity articles

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Conflict of interest

As the article has been hatnoted that I mat have a conflict of interest in editing, I declare that I have no connection to the organisation nor anybody in it. Nor did I edit for financial gain. Kohlinekys (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notable investments

My attempt to add some of the organisation's more notable investments has met with some resistance. Given that other similar articles have these sections I thought this was a way to improve and further demonstrate the organistaion's notability. I will refrain from further editing and leave it for others to decide whether it is. Kohlinekys (talk) 02:53, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Investments in/from notable properties/companies doesn't demonstrate notability. Substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject demonstrates notability. Books written about the company, significant articles in real magazines (as opposed to puff pieces or PR blasts), that kind of thing. (I'm not saying that you are using puff or PR articles, just giving examples of what not to use.) Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk)