Talk:Unanimity
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Cite needed
[edit]"However, there is considerable and difficult-to-controvert evidence that most unanimous decisions are a sign of coercion, fear, undue persuasive power or eloquence, inability to comprehend alternatives, or plain impatience with the process of debate." Perhaps the article could link to some of this "considerable and difficult-to-controvert evidence"? --Amazon10x 03:11, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- I removed it; it's been half a year now and it was still unsourced. Besides, if true, does that means the majority of American jury verdicts are bull? --DMAJohnson 02:02, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
A question: Does 'unanimity' require that everyone agree or just require that no-one disagrees ? In other words, if someone abstains, can the decision still be unanimous ? SimonHolzman 22:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- "Unanimity is a real word!"
- I know that, I put it in quotes to make it easier to see that unanimity was the concept I was referring to... although on re-reading it I see that the quotes were not really needed. Oh well, I tend to go with the principle that grammer facilitates communication rather than the other way around. Thus, if I need to use poor grammer to make myself understood better, I don't feel a whole lot of shame !
- By the way, who are you quoting ? ;)SimonHolzman (talk) 18:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Can you find some citations for dictatorships coercing unanimity ?SimonHolzman (talk) 18:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Unanimity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080210062143/http://domino.un.org:80/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea1cc08301c485256cf600606959/4690652a351277438525634c006dce10!OpenDocument to http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/361eea1cc08301c485256cf600606959/4690652a351277438525634c006dce10!OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
What does unanimous mean in terms of percentage?
[edit]Does unanimous explicitly mean "100%" support? Are there circumstances where a supermajority is considered unanimous? 68.50.82.21 (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2022 (UTC)