Talk:Umbrella brand
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Rollins College/Writing about Wikipedia (Fall 2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Fall 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University College London/MSIN1003 Information World (Autumn 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
Change article name to imply umbrella brand and family brand
[edit]Umbrella brand and Family brand are interchangeable terms should there be a change in the name of the page ? (Anarula (talk))
Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
[edit]data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bef7/0bef7bac28a0ef3e25d9d7e6fce156b1559327b1" alt=""
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Not umbrella branding
[edit]The examples you give for Coca Cola are not umbrella branding. They would be if they were marketed as Coca Cola Fanta, Coca Cola Minute Maid, etc., but they aren't. 2600:4040:5D3F:9A00:2835:1515:F1B4:AB41 (talk) 13:34, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class Brands articles
- High-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- High-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class Retailing articles
- Mid-importance Retailing articles
- WikiProject Retailing articles