Talk:Ulusalism

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 February 2022 by reviewer Styyx (talk · contribs).

Turkey

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Atatürk's socialism" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Atatürk's socialism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 5#Atatürk's socialism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:50, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Second paragraph does not belong to an encyclopedia article

Those journals are not accepted around the world enough to be considered as a source for wikipedia. People who know how journals work will recognize such journals that are only published for creating so-called scientific credibility for their funding organizations. Content is also completely biased and provides a political discourse instead of encyclopedic information. Aloisnebegn (talk) 22:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We would ask you to present alternative viewpoints and incorporate them into the article. A journal does not have to be accepted "around the world", but it can be used to present one side of the story as it does here. Oaktree b (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]