Jump to content

Talk:Ultimate Wolverine vs. Hulk

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Continuity

[edit]

Now that the series has been cancelled, does anyone know if it is still part of the ultimate universe continuity? I haven't heard anything about this. So until issue three drops I'll have to assume it isn't part of continuity. Since this is just my speculation, I will not put it in the article just yet. But If anyone has heard anything about it, I think it would be important to put in. Bhold1 00:57, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections/Criticisms

[edit]

The caption with the image of the Hulk with women says that he has kidnapped them to form a harem. This is completely speculation, so I removed said caption from this page as well as the Ultimate Hulk page.

the events are not taking place after ff vs x-men mini series

X4 was mentioned in the date night arc by colossus, wolverine didn't leave the x-men until ultimate x-men #69 where he missed the phoenix arc and why he was absent in the deadpool arc USM he returned tp the x-men in issue #72 at the beggining of the magical arc

Rumo(u)rs

[edit]

In the section on issue 3 it talks about rumors. Are rumors supposed to be written here? not just facts?--JayDub 05:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, in this case, Mister Late- er...Lindelof is seemingly holding everything up. That's more common at Marvel than DC, but by no means a good thing. The "rumor" is likely true and indicates that Lindelof is to blame, rather than anyone else. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 05:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TV show Trivia

[edit]

In the Trivia section, it currently says:

Bruce Banner is referred to as both "David" and "Bixby", in reference to the 1980's television series, where "David Banner" was portrayed by actor Bill Bixby (rumor says the name 'David' was used instead of 'Bruce' because the producer said it had a "homosexual ring" to it).

The parenthetical comment seems more like trivia for the show, not trivia for this comic. Should it be moved to the TV series article? -- JHunterJ 20:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree - the portion in parantheses doesn't really have much to do with the comic. Whether or not it is added to the TV series article, it could probably be cleaned up from this one. --Reverend Loki 15:30, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree - The item in parenthesis is not required, should be added to trivia for the TV show. --Stevegillan 13 July 2006 (UTC)


New section completely unrelated to the above section

[edit]

the series has been cancelled for now........83.130.10.80 22:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source listed at the end of the subsection titled "Issue #3" appears to be a dead link. Any thoughts? Mathfreq 00:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ultimatehulk2.jpg

[edit]

Image:Ultimatehulk2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]