Talk:USS Wainwright (DD-62)

USS Wainwright (DD-62) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

USS Wainwright (DD-62) is part of the Tucker class destroyers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 18, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
June 11, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

A summary of this article appears in Tucker class destroyer.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Wainwright (DD-62)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Below is my review:

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
I think Reinstated should go before Struck in infobox, so that the dates follow the chronological order.
Good point. Swapped.

Early Career - 'She returned to Boston on the 10th for a short period in the Navy Yard': 10th of February or March?
Changed to 10 March. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World War I - 'Wainwright again briefly patrolled Hampton Roads before heading for the New York Navy Yard on the 14th': 14th of what? I think it is April, which apparently becomes clear later, but should be mentioned here at the first instance.
Good suggestion. Changed. — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World War I - 'This division— ably led by Comdr. Joseph K. Taussig': I guess the use of words such as ably is discouraged per WP:MoS.
Yes, it is discouraged and I just missed this one. (With some of these DANFS-based articles it's hard to catch all of the jingoistic and/or pro-American statements.) — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Discrepancy in speed - 56 km/h (text) and 56.8 km/h (infobox)
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Thanks - DSachan (talk) 15:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've addressed all of your concerns. If this passes, you will have exhausted all of my GA nominations (except for John Henry Turpin) in a two-day span. Thanks! — Bellhalla (talk) 05:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bellhalla, speed issue is not yet addressed. I somehow missed Turpin's nomination. I can do it later today. DSachan (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know how I missed that, but I think I've got it now. Also, thanks for the Turpin review, too. — Bellhalla (talk) 11:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]