Talk:USS Shipley Bay/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 10:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Review comments
[edit]- As with the other reviews I've done on these escort carriers, the namesake information should be in the main body of article
- Mention battle stars in main body
- Reorder cites at end of first paragraph of design description into numerical order
- Decommissioning date in infobox doesn't match what is described in service history
- The Samples ref should be listed in the bibliography - no page for cite?
- Image tags check out OK
- Dupe link - kamikaze - first used in design & description section, second usage in service history
That's it for me. Zawed (talk) 10:14, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Zawed: I've responded to your points. Stikkyy t/c 17:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Almost there, just the namesake of the bay (John Shipley) is still only present in the lead, not the body. Once fixed, this will be good to go. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Zawed: Looks good now. Stikkyy t/c 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Sweet as, passing as GA now as I believe that it meets the necessary criteria. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:52, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Zawed: Looks good now. Stikkyy t/c 00:47, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Almost there, just the namesake of the bay (John Shipley) is still only present in the lead, not the body. Once fixed, this will be good to go. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2019 (UTC)