Talk:USS O'Flaherty

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS O'Flaherty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

USS O'Flaherty has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 26, 2019	Good article nominee	Listed
January 27, 2020	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS O'Flaherty/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 20:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will take this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 20:30, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zawed: Kges1901 (talk) 12:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the delay in getting to this. I have reviewed up until the Guam section, with no issues spotted apart from a possible typo which I have fixed. I have to take a break now (my four-week old son is screaming his head off), more to follow. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter-killer operations and Lingayen Gulf: perhaps link kamikaze

Linked already

Iwo Jima: perhaps link the battle here: the invasion of Iwo Jima began on 19 February

According to the Battle of Iwo Jima article, both the battle and invasion began that day, it is a semantic distinction here.

Okinawa: suggest rephrasing "O'Flaherty contributed with her aft 40 mm guns to flak that helped shoot down of a diving Japanese A6M Zero."

Fixed

Okinawa: "...shafts had a missing fairwater...", what is a fairwater? There are no obvious links on Wikipedia so may need to rephrase. Perhaps just refer to her shafts and steering needing repairs.

Made less specific

Okinawa: suggest "She was drydocked on ARD-26 between 4 and 8 June for the necessary repairs,..."

Done

Okinawa: "...joined up with Task Unit 32.1.3 on the same day." Please check the Task Unit designation, previously stated she was joining 32.1.1.

Order was changed en route, but I've made it less specific because I think there was too much detail there

References: the Friedman 1981 reference is missing the state, plus the Gardiner ref shows the state as initials, not written out in full like the others.
Dupe links: Guam, Majuro, Wake Island

Fixed

Image tags look OK

Finally got back to this to finish off the review comments, sorry for the delay. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 21:08, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes look good, passing as GA now as I am satisfied that it meets the necessary criteria. Zawed (talk) 07:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]