Jump to content

Talk:USS Leary (DD-158)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Leary (DD-158)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 16:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

MOS issues:

Referencing:

  • What makes the Andrew Hague Convoy Database a WP:RS?--Tomobe03 (talk) 09:39, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not sure of that myself, that section was added by someone else. I do know it's been allowed in other GAs, and that there is a template devoted to citing sources on that site. I can go looking around for the discussion of its notability. —Ed!(talk) 12:19, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • Indeed, the template seems to give some sort of credibility to the source - at least I suspect someone gave some thought to it. I saw Sturmvogel used the same source in several successful GANs, so I asked him for advice, but given the previous use in GAs (four reviews at least passed using that source) and the template, I'm leaning towards accepting it.--Tomobe03 (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Prose:

  • In ... took part in a large-scale battle exercises ... is it one exercise or more - either the indefinite article or the plural suffix must go.
  • The 01:58 in On 24 December 1943, the task group was caught in a storm in the North Atlantic when at 01:58, Leary made a ping on a U-Boat off her starboard bow. is not clear, at least to me - is it am or pm?

Interesting article. I think there are no further issues relevant to the GAR.--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]