Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Concord (PG-3) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

USS Concord (PG-3) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

USS Concord (PG-3) is part of the Yorktown class gunboats series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 28, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
May 19, 2009	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A summary of this article appears in Yorktown class gunboat.

Quarantine Station Era

The Concord was assigned to the Public Health Service of the Department of the Treasury, NOT the US Coast Guard. The vessel served as a hulk for the detention of passengers and crew for the purposes of quarantine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.162.30 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think this has been addressed. — Bellhalla (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:USS Concord (PG-3)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Below is my review of the article:

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
1. Lead: I would personally keep the lead maximum of 3 paragraphs.
I shortened it to three. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Discrepancy in date of laying down: Lead and text say it to be March 1888; the infobox says it is May 1888.
3. Discrepancy in date of launch: lead says, March 1890; the main text says March 1889.
The May 1888 and March 1890 dates were the correct ones; I've corrected the article. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Rest everything looks fine. There were a few 'on's missing before the dates. I inserted them. Thanks - DSachan (talk) 09:12, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. — Bellhalla (talk) 10:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]