Talk:USS Albacore (SS-218)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Albacore (SS-218) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Shipwrecks Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Four Presidential Unit Citations?

I believe it is rather two unit citations for two patrols each.JMOprof (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lede, "probably", etc...

Assume the lede was written before wreck was confirmed Albacore. Word "probably" could apply to how the sub was sunk, what date the sub was sunk and where tgecsub was sunk, as it is currently written. But the location is now known, and the word "probably" no longer applies to this fact, although I assume it still does for when and how. Should be a fast fix for an experienced editor.72.181.112.54 (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date of discovery of wreck

I did a little digging and found Dr Ura's blog [[1]] regarding the discovery and it looks like the date mentioned in the Wiki article is consistent with his blog, even though the English translated NHK News Web article is dated 20 days prior to the date he mentions the Albacore being found. Maybe someone who is skilled at editing the page can add some more references. Of course, the blog is in Japanese. Laserray7 (talk) 03:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]