Talk:UKNova
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2007. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
The site appears to have been shut down by the BBC and MPAA today but this is just an april fools joke! Navigate to one of the sub-pages and the site will function as normal. :D
Tamlyn 01:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- It'd be interesting to see what effect this prank had on the tracker's traffic. I've heard tell of a number of fooled users deleting their .torrents, and can imagine some may even have removed content from their hard-drives too. =D If anyone gets figures, as a percentage drop or something, it might be worth working them into the article. ◄ИΞШSΜΛЯΞ► 10:52, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Jimjeroo does not even appear to be user on UKNova? And there is nothing about this on the UKNova forums ?
If there is not citation for this soon I'm removing it... 12:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fully refuted on UKNova's forums ... Jimjeroo's comments say it all .."I didn't tell the 'Daily Sport' I was selling the site. I mentioned leasing it out like a bouncy castle and standing next to it with a huge set of keys dangling off my belt while children got fell of it and got nosebleeds, but that's about it."! Jaster 09:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- JimJeroo is and active member of UKNova. Spaced1999 06:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
It's a corker. Early signs are that this has been their most successful prank yet. -- BrokenStar 17:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Why was this deleted ?
It is prominent enough to be listed on the Template:BitTorrent as a prominent site (It is now the *only* one without it's own page) and Listed in Category:BitTorrent websites where the majority of the pages are minor unremarkable sites ?
Does someone have a vendetta against UKNova ?
lɘɘяɘM яɘɫƨɐƮ 11:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKNova (2nd nomination). --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Odd, apart from the original poster, the discussion all seemed in favour of keeping - the the exception of someone who was only posting from an IP address. I wonder if an appeal is in order? Nfitz 23:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)