Talk:UGM-96 Trident I

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / North America / United States / Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Trident C4 CEP

According to Aviation Week and Space Technology, "Guidance accuracy for the Trident C4's Mk4 reentry system is...under 1,000 feet circular error probable at 4,000 nautical miles, well below the 1,500 feet goal". At ranges less than 4,000 nautical miles the accuracy is even better. A Pentagon report to congress stated that, "Trident I missile system accuracy is now about the same as Minuteman III operational accuracy". Trident I tests during 1983 consistently achieved CEPs of 750 feet.

http://docs.nrdc.org/nuclear/files/nuc_85090001a_n20.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonshot925 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate and incomplete

This article is inaccurate and incomplete in virtually all respects: dimensions, historical "facts", written descriptions, and the added internal silhouette drawing. It needs to be thoroughly researched and done over.Magneticlifeform (talk) 02:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead with this research and revision, Magneticlifeform. Thom2002 (talk) 23:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]